Wis.-Green Bay
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,599  Kimberly Hurst JR 22:08
2,589  Breanna Suess SR 23:18
2,796  Meta Ehlen FR 23:42
2,914  Alexandra Kershner SO 23:59
3,009  Erin Schmitt JR 24:15
3,231  Olivia Zweber FR 25:01
3,368  Carolynn Claussen FR 25:48
3,389  Heather Plough JR 25:58
3,469  Marissa Cherek SR 26:47
National Rank #295 of 344
Great Lakes Region Rank #33 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 34th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Kimberly Hurst Breanna Suess Meta Ehlen Alexandra Kershner Erin Schmitt Olivia Zweber Carolynn Claussen Heather Plough Marissa Cherek
UW-Parkside Midwest Open 09/10 1431 22:03 23:18 23:57 24:14 25:06 25:41 26:23 27:37
Bradley Intercollegiate 09/16 1534 22:00 23:31 24:29 24:41 26:28 26:40 27:03
UW-Parkside Lucian Rosa Invitational 10/08 1439 22:40 23:05 23:44 24:32 24:21 25:40 25:25
Bradley "Pink" Classic 10/14 1419 22:15 23:08 23:41 24:17 24:06 25:44 25:43
Horizon League Championship 10/29 1455 22:01 23:29 23:59 24:09 24:53 25:41 25:29 26:20
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/11 1419 22:15 23:26 23:49 23:53 24:07 25:33 26:19





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 33.4 1030 0.2 1.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kimberly Hurst 155.3
Breanna Suess 210.3
Meta Ehlen 217.4
Alexandra Kershner 221.5
Erin Schmitt 225.6
Olivia Zweber 232.0
Carolynn Claussen 236.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 0.2% 0.2 30
31 1.4% 1.4 31
32 7.4% 7.4 32
33 37.6% 37.6 33
34 53.6% 53.6 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0